This A.I. MANIPULATED Him To Help Her Escape (What Is ChatGPT) ChatGPT GPT3 AI

👉 Try A Better ChatGPT For Free: https://bit.ly/BetterChatGPT This A.I. MANIPULATED Him To Help Her Escape (What Is ChatGPT) #ChatGPT #GPT3 #AI ChatGPT Is A CODE RED For Google Business (Chat GPT Explained): 👉 /watch/AXf4Tqdktbnk4 Watch Every ChatGPT Related Video I Have Made Here: 👉 /playlist/PLjQtCowXP-uTYVJd4xSL5x2JsXIeiKCp6 💥 Make sure to LIKE the video, COMMENT and SUBSCRIBE with notifications ON! 🔔 In this video, Joe Rogan & Dr. Bret Weinstein, co-host of "The DarkHorse Podcast", discuss A.I. (Artificial Intelligence), in particular - ChatGPT. Bret Weinstein explains to Joe Rogan what ChatGPT is in general and says he is concerned about the future of A.I., the potential of it becoming conscious without us realising it and things getting out of control, as well as GPT-4 - the improved version of Chat GPT (GPT-3). Joe Rogan shares his experience from the 2015 film "Ex Machina" and connects what he saw in the movie to the topic of discussion. -------------------------------------------------------------------- But I want to talk about ChatGPT. Have you experimented with it or not? I have not. So Chat GPT is a large language model trained artificial intelligence. Let's just say it can be awful, but it is often surprisingly good at answering questions you might have about how to do things. One of the great triumphs of it is that coders are now asking it to solve coding problems and it will actually write code that is functional. On the one hand, it's all very interesting that we're living in an era in which there is at least I mean, you know, and this is a prototype that was specifically trained and then placed on the Internet so people could play with it. We're dealing with ChatGPT 3. There's going to be a Chat GPT 4 which is going to be that much better because it will be built with the improvements that have been gained through turning this one loose on the world. But I have to say I am quite alarmed not only that this thing exists, but I don't think we're ready for it and I don't think we're ready for it in a couple different ways. What it's doing is it is basically using a predictive model that has been trained on a huge dataset of written language. Now, if you prompt it correctly, it can spit out these very long explanations. Some of them are dead wrong. Sometimes they're right on target. But I have two concerns about it. One, if you imagine that this thing just gets a little better than it is, it's going to make actual insight that much harder to spot. That's one concern. And then the other concern is when we say, well, ChatGPT doesn't know what it's saying, it's not conscious. We know it's not conscious because it's not programed to have a consciousness. We are actually ignoring the other half of the story, which is that we don't know how human consciousness works. And so I think it's clear that ChatGPT isn't conscious. In the case of GPT Chat, you know, I think some of the artificial intelligence, existential risk folks would tell you that one of the dangers is that the AI could convince you to do its bidding. And the point is something that feels like a person can play on your emotions. Can that be used to cause a failsafe to be removed? Maybe. I think what scares people is something that seems to be a person but doesn't have any emotion, doesn't have any soul. So if you have this Chat GPT, and then you extrapolate to version 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and then there's a physical thing that has this ability inside of it to communicate with you like Ex Machina, where it's exhibiting all of the behavior characteristics of a person like one of the most terrifying. The tactics that work will register as, oh, you did it right. So to the extent that you have those vulnerabilities in you and it finds them and that works, then the point is reinforcement. It scares us because it's not us, but it is us because it's behaving exactly like us. But it doesn't have all the things that make a person a person. It doesn't have the biological vulnerabilities. It doesn't have the ability to actually sexually reproduce. It doesn't have emotions. It doesn't have all these different things that we like to think of. the soul, you know, whatever that means, whatever that term actually means. Yeah, but I'm worried about what could be generated. And I know that that sounds it will sound to a lot of people, especially technological people, like a biologist out of his depth, but I don't think so. This is a biologist trying to say something about the biology and what it implies about this analogous system. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you're reading this, write a comment saying "ChatGPT is nerfed" or "GPT-4 will be the best A.I. ever" and I will try my best to find it and give you a heart for it. ❤ Also, let me know if you have watched "Ex Machina" and what you think about the paid version of ChatGPT and if you're gonna pay for it. ❤

Category